Classifieds Advertise Archive Subscriptions Family Announcements Photos Digital Editions/Apps
Connect with us

Bradley Bytes

Silly Season: when lesbians come out in headlines

Published

on

Apparently working by a window can help you sleep better . . .

Bradley Bytes – A sort of political column by Dara Bradley

“The NHS to fund sperm bank for lesbians,” screamed the front page of the Daily Mail.

The dramatic headline, and the first paragraph, suggested that Britain was to get its first NHS-funded sperm bank to “make it easier for lesbians and single women” to have children.

Read through the piece and it becomes apparent that the fertility clinic is not just for lesbians or for singletons. In fact, as was pointed out on social media, it would be open to anyone regardless of their sexual preferences or marital status, even those finding it difficult to conceive.

“NHS to fund fertility clinic for married, straight women” isn’t as catchy though, is it?

The lesbian sperm-bank story signalled the arrival of Silly-Season. Or at least confirmed that it was in full swing.

Silly Season is the traditional quiet time in the news industry when the courts are closed and politicians are off.

There isn’t a whole pile of ‘serious’ hard-hitting home news to report, and so the white space on pages is filled with what might be kindly described as ‘fluff’.

The Irish Sun confirmed it was Silly Season with the headline: “Woman left feeling dizzy a year after going on fairground ride”. We kid you not.

Reporting the findings of bizarre obscure surveys is meat and drink during Silly Season.

The Irish Independent, for instance, had this gem: “Working by the window is key to good night’s sleep”.

It does get you wondering who in God’s name decided to do a study on the correlation between distance from windows at work, and insomnia. Are ‘academics’ that stuck for stuff to survey?

Even the broadsheets succumb to Silly Season.

The Irish Times, the so-called paper of record, carried a story about people complaining on social media that the milk in their fridges was going sour before sell-by dates.

What next, a story about people moaning on Twitter that loaves of bread are going stale quicker than normal?

To lend the article weight – as only the IT can – it contacted the Irish Dairy Council to query them about complaints of milk souring within three days of purchase.

“There is no reason for normal pasteurised milk to go off more quickly during the warm weather spell as long as it is stored at the right temperature,” the Dairy Council said.

For more, read this week’s Connacht Sentinel.

CITY TRIBUNE

Galway 2020 defenders’ mortifying muscle memory 

Published

on

Bradley Bytes – a sort of political column with Dara Bradley

It’s amazing how quickly people try to re-write history. If Galway 2020 happened, say, 20 years ago, you could maybe blame fading memory to make allowances for the maroon-tinted glasses of those who defend it to the hilt.

But Galway’s term as European Capital of Culture concluded not 20 weeks ago, and the ‘see no evil, hear no evil’ brigade are out in force with propaganda that would make Donald Trump blush.

The defenders of Galway 2020 usually fall into two categories. There are people who work or worked for the organisation directly or indirectly and/or who contributed to winning the prestigious designation. And there are those who are deluded. Some fall into both categories – deluded and with a vested interest in Galway 2020’s reputation.

It matters not that the latest criticism of the ill-fated – and extremely expensive – project was contained in an official Government report, compiled by an office with impeccable credibility, the Comptroller and Auditor General.

Be it bar-stool commentary or analysis of the CA&G, the reaction to criticism is always the same. The defenders metaphorically stick index fingers in both ears, close their eyes and chant: “Yada, yada, yada, blah, blah, blah”. This would be fine if it wasn’t the taxpayer who’s had to pick up the tab.

It’s like the defenders of Galway 2020 have an inbuilt muscle memory. They’ve spent so long defending Galway 2020 that, no matter what the new charge is, their memory system automatically kicks in.

And while the muscle memory that instinctively compels them to defend is, through repetitive use, as sharp as ever, their actual memories are mortifyingly short. Or maybe they’ve selective memory. Or both.

The few – and they’re getting fewer – who defend Galway 2020 often spout the narrative that but for the Covid-19 pandemic it would’ve been brilliant.

And to a casual observer, someone who never heard of Galway 2020 and its litany of problems from day one, maybe that explanation seems plausible. But the argument does not hold water.

The C&AG last week highlighted how Galway 2020 had planned to raise €6.8 million from the private sector. This figure was used in the bid book to persuade judges to give Galway the designation.

In the end, it managed to raise just €400,000 in cash, plus €500,000 in “in-kind” support.

Defenders’ muscle memory kicked in and they said, “Ah, but the pandemic, how could you raise money during Covid?”.

This deliberately ignores Galway 2020’s own bid book, which promised to raise €4 million from the private sector pre-Covid in 2017, 2018 and 2019. It didn’t materialise, which shows the projected income from businesses was overinflated, or the private sector had reservations about supporting this project long before Covid.

This is just one implied criticism in the C&AG report, which doesn’t even mention the non-appointment of a Business Engagement Director, whose job – if the appointment had proceeded – would’ve been to tap the private sector for money.

Maybe the defenders should read the C&AG report. It might help to de-programme their mortifying muscle memory.

(Photo: The scene at South Park at the same time as the Galway 2020 European Capital of Culture opening ceremony).

This is a shortened preview version of Bradley Bytes. To read more, see this week’s Galway City Tribune. You can buy a digital edition HERE.

Continue Reading

CITY TRIBUNE

Colette’s cycling ‘cabal’ puts ruling pact in peril 

Published

on

Bradley Bytes – a sort of political column with Dara Bradley

Danger here! Galway City councillors, not a month back from summer recess, and already the ruling pact is in peril of falling apart. Or as one wag put it, “it’s in tatters – again!”

Unsurprisingly, plans for a temporary cycle-lane along the Salthill Prom are causing friction.

Or, rather, the decision by the ruling pact – or some members of the ruling pact – to opt not to have a debate about those plans at last Monday week’s Council meeting has caused ructions. The fall-out continues.

Having read the previous Friday’s Galway City Tribune, where journalist Denise McNamara had elicited all 18 Councillors’ views on how they intended to vote on the cycleway motion, Mayor of Galway, Colette Connolly (Ind) called a Zoom meeting of councillors. Not all of them though, just a select few.

It took place prior to the official City Council meeting, but excluded two councillors in the pact – Independents Terry O’Flaherty and Donal Lyons – who had indicated to the Tribune that they would be voting against the Mayor’s motion.

Cllr Niall McNelis (Lab) had splinters lodged in his backside from sitting on the fence when he told the Tribune that he would be abstaining in the vote; he too did not receive an invite to Colette’s cosy cabal.

As it transpired, Terry and Niall voted for the Mayor’s motion, and Donal stuck to his guns and voted against.

What has irked them, though, is they were not invited to the Mayor’s unofficial pact meeting by virtue of the views they had expressed in this newspaper days before the vote.

Former Mayor Mike Cubbard couldn’t make Colette’s cabal but it’s understood the others – Fine Gaelers and Greens – were there. The excluded trio felt that it was decided by the ‘pact within a pact’ to vote for the Mayor’s motion without debate. Not very democratic.

To make matters worse, at least two councillors who are not in the pact – including one from Fianna Fáil – was invited, while the trio who voted for Collette to become Mayor were excluded.

The King of Knocknacarra, Lyons, is miffed and has threatened to walk from the pact. McNelis, who had to hold his nose when backing the former Labour councillor to become First Citizen, confirmed he was considering his position, too.

“I’m deeply, deeply disappointed and I’ll be seriously considering my position with the pact. For a Mayor that preaches to the rest of us about transparency, and about how to run meetings, to turn around and exclude me and others from a meeting; to exclude people who supported her is deeply, deeply disappointing,” McNelis told us.

A bit rich from someone whose loyalty is best summed up by the nickname his colleagues gave him, ‘Three Pacts’. But he has a point. And with Donal nearly overboard, Owen Hanley outside the circle and Niall contemplating his position, the pact is in peril – again!

(Photo: Labour Cllr Níall McNelis who is “deeply, deeply” disappointed’ at being excluded from a meeting organised by Mayor Colette Connolly on the Salthill cycleway debate, says he’ll be “seriously considering” his position in the Council’s ruling pact)

This is a shortened preview version of Bradley Bytes. To read more, see this week’s Galway City Tribune. You can buy a digital edition HERE.

Continue Reading

CITY TRIBUNE

Galway City Council axes arts grants in the ‘Capital of Culture’

Published

on

Bradley Bytes – a sort of political column with Dara Bradley

The amount of money awarded by Galway City Council in arts grants this year has been cut by about 6%.

Some €425,000 was distributed to arts organisations last year, when they were late receiving their cheques.

This year it has been confirmed that the grants will total €400,000 or €25,000 less than in 2020, when Galway held the Capital of Culture title.

Cynics might say that the extra 6% in funding last year was thrown at arts organisations in order to keep them quiet about the delay in distributing the funding.

Now, the local authority has reverted to the pre-2020 figure, not that you’d know from the press release issued by City Hall last week.

Funding to some groups was cut by half. Galway Choral Association is down €1,000 to €1,000; Galway Art Club is down €500 to €500; and An Taibhdhearc is down €1,000 to €1,000.

Brú Theatre lost 33% of its City Council funding, down by €1,000 to €2,000. Druid also took a €1,000 hit and was allocated €28,000 for 2021.

Macnas has suffered the biggest cut – it’s down by €5,000 from €24,000 last year to just €19,000 this year.

It was not all cuts. Westside Arts Festival was among the groups that got more money this year – up €600 to €3,000. But axing the overall allocation of arts grants is not a clever move by the local authority of a city that benefits so much off the backs of artists’ endeavours.

(Photo: Gilgamesh, a Galway 2020 commission by Macnas, which has had its arts grants cut by the City Council).
This is a shortened preview version of Bradley Bytes. To read more, see this week’s Galway City Tribune. You can buy a digital edition HERE.

Continue Reading

Local Ads

Local Ads

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement

Trending