A Galway City councillor has accused public hospital management of still failing to monitor consultants to ensure they did their contracted public work even though a media investigation revealed one local medic worked nearly one third less than he was obliged to.
At this week’s Regional Health Forum West meeting, Fine Gael’s Padraig Conneely demanded to know what sanctions had been imposed on the consultant who had worked 13 hours on average a week even though he was paid to work 37 hours under his contract.
The RTÉ Prime Time investigation which examined the work of 36 consultants at Galway University Hospitals and found that 80% were engaging in private work which exceeded what was allowed under their contracts.
Most consultants are supposed to adhere to an 80% public patient and 20% private patient breakdown. The investigation found that 15 consultants in Galway worked just a day-and-a-half per week in the public system.
“Have you spoken to that consultant? Have you spoken to other consultants. He’s not the only one. Can I name the consultant? Everyone seems to know his name. You say the management of compliance is a continuing process but who is managing compliance? The compliance is simply not there. Have you got the money back?”
Saolta Hospital Group CEO Maurice Power told the meeting said the vast majority of consultants – 98% – are compliant with their public/private ratios as stipulated under their contracts.
He stated that consultants are continually monitored and he sees the statistics across his desk on a monthly basis.
“87% of activity across the group is public work,” he stated.
Cllr Conneely said this did not reflect the reality on the ground. The consultant found to have worked just 13 hours a week had been observed for eight weeks.
So instead of working eight weeks, the consultant worked the equivalent of three weeks and based on HSE salary scales, he was paid more than €14,000 for work he did not do.
The 2008 Hospital Consultants’ Contract provided significant pay increases in return for consultants agreeing to limit their private practice. Under the deal, most consultants are contracted to work between 37 and 39 hours per week in the public system.
Galway’s two city hospital has 234 consultants; just 6% are totally dedicated to public patients. A further 27% are ‘Type B’ – consultants who can have private practice but in a public hospital only.
‘Furore’ over rezoning plan for access to B&B on Headford Road in Galway
From the Galway City Tribune – Councillors have voted to rezone a small section of Terryland Forest Park from recreational and amenity use to residential.
A majority of elected members also approved the insertion of a specific objective into the new Galway City Development Plan 2023-29 that would allow an entrance to the site through Sandyvale Lawn.
This was to facilitate safe access to a home and B&B business off Headford Road, which had become dangerous due to the recent changeover of Kirwan roundabout to a traffic lights junction.
Residents of Sandyvale Lawn, a 100+ housing estate off Headford Road, had objected to the proposals, and so too had Tuatha Terryland Forest Park, an alliance of volunteers and organisations.
The Office of Planning Regulator (OPR) and Chief Executive of Galway City Council, Brendan McGrath, as well as his planning department and recreational and amenity department, had all objected to the changes.
The rezoning, and insertion of a specific objective to facilitate an entrance to the estate, was contained in the same material alteration that came before councillors, but they were obliged to vote on them separately.
Several councillors argued that a new entrance to Sandyvale Lawn was necessary to facilitate safe access to a B&B on Headford Road.
This article first appeared in the print edition of the Galway City Tribune. You can support our journalism by subscribing to the Galway City Tribune HERE. A one-year digital subscription costs just €89.00. The print edition is in shops every Friday.
Cllr Mike Crowe (FF) said the family who owned this business and home had been treated poorly by the City Council during the reconfiguration of the Kirwan roundabout to a signalised junction.
Referencing the large opposition to the proposal, he said the “furore over this is astounding” and argued the impact on green space and the Sandyvale Lawn estate would be minimal.
Cllr Crowe said the proposal was about creating a safe exit and entrance.
Cllr Frank Fahy (FG) said there had been a number of near misses of cars coming in and out of the B&B, which were captured on video.
He said the current system, whereby an amber traffic light allows access to the B&B was “haphazard and dangerous”. He feared there would be a fatality if a new entrance was not approved.
“I don’t like to rezone RA [Recreational & Amenity] land but in this situation we don’t have a choice. We have to remedy a dangerous situation,” Cllr Fahy said.
Cllr Colette Connolly (Ind) said RA land was “absolutely sacrosanct” and she would not vote to rezone.
She asked what the legal position was regarding a rezoning of green space, which residents claimed had been paid for through a green levy applied 40 years ago when the estate was built.
Cllr Owen Hanley (Soc Dem) said he had voted initially to include the material alteration to support the B&B owners, as the removal of the roundabout had made access more dangerous for them.
But he said he would now support the residents of Sandyvale Lawn who had opposed the change.
Cllr Declan McDonnell said the family had lived there for 50 years and now it was more dangerous accessing their home through no fault of their own.
He said it was not safe that they have to enter and exit their home on an amber flashing light.
In a submission, residents of Sandyvale Lawn said the new entrance would negatively impact their estate, by increasing traffic, noise and an addition risk to children playing. They said it could be turned into another rat run like Ballinfoile and Tirellan. They also argued against the loss of green space.
Submissions also objected to the loss of the green space which was part of Terryland Forest Park, dubbed the ‘lungs of the city’.
Mr McGrath asked councillors not to rezone the land and not to insert the specific objective for a new entrance.
Both changes, however, were approved. The RA to R rezoning passed by a 12-5 vote and the specific objective for a new entrance passed by 11-5.
Money-back vending machines set to be rolled out in Galway
From the Galway City Tribune – Galway’s first ‘reverse vending machines’ – which reward the public for recycling plastic bottles and aluminium cans – are set to open in Doughiska.
German supermarket giant Lidl has sought planning permission to roll out the money-back machines under a Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) which was first introduced in a Dun Laoghaire branch last year.
The company wants to make changes to the Doughiska store – including the demolition of the existing entrance pod and removal of the shopping trolley bay – to make way for a DRS room with five vending machines.
The machines will accept plastic drinks bottles and cans – for each one deposited, custoemrs will receive a 10c voucher for spending in Lidl, up to a maximum voucher limit of €2.
According to the retailer, each machine can collect and process up to 17,000 units each week – this will equate to 1,500 tonnes per year when the system is rolled out at all 170 stores in Ireland.
City Council planners are due to make a decision on the planning application – which also includes the construction of a new standalone sheltered bay for shopping trolleys and the relocation of a number of ‘blue badge’ parking spaces – shortly before Christmas.
This article first appeared in the print edition of the Galway City Tribune. You can support our journalism by subscribing to the Galway City Tribune HERE. A one-year digital subscriotion costs just €89.00. The print edition is in shops every Friday.
Councillors ignore zoning advice of City Hall, Planning Regulator and local campaigners
From the Galway City Tribune – Two agricultural sites in Roscam have been rezoned by city councillors to allow for housing to be built – despite strong objections from planners.
Councillors voted to rezone from agriculture (G) to residential (R2) a 1.67-hectare site close to the coastline in Roscam.
Cllr Noel Larkin (Ind) proposed the material alteration, and it was seconded by Imelda Byrne (FF) and supported on a vote of 13 for, three against, one abstention and one absentee.
Save Roscam Peninsula, a lobby group of local residents, had campaigned against the rezoning.
The Office of Planning Regulator (OPR) said it was contrary to national and regional planning policy, and the Chief Executive of Galway City Council, Brendan McGrath, and the Planning Department team strongly advised elected members not to rezone.
Mr McGrath said that the G zoning are predominantly agriculture lands “but also have an important natural environment and landscape value, which distinguishes them from less visually sensitive and amenity rich agricultural lands”.
Cllr Larkin said that the reason he was proposing the motion was to allow the landowner to build a family home. He insisted it was for immediate family.
Senior Executive Planner Caroline Phelan said moving from agriculture to residential zoning “is not to facilitate a family home”.
Cllrs Frank Fahy (FG) and Declan McDonnell (Ind), who both supported the material alteration, said the landowner had to move to Craughwell due to planning issues at the site.
Cllr Fahy said the land was zoned agriculture, but the owner was not permitted to farm on the site.
“If you can’t carry out agriculture on an agricultural site then there is something seriously wrong with our planning system,” he said.
Ms Coleman said that site was close to a monastic site, Roscam tower and church, which were protected structures of archaeological interest.
The site is also at a protected panoramic view, she said, and there were concerns the rezoning would conflict with that.
Mr McGrath said rezoning the land would be contrary to national and regional policy.
“This site is located in an area that is at a remove from existing water and wastewater services and lacks proximity to the existing public transport and pedestrian networks. To allow this rezoning would represent and uncoordinated piecemeal approach to zoning. Expanding residential use in this area is unsustainable and will create additional demands for services and essential infrastructure,” he said.
The current zoning helps climate action by “supporting carbon sequestration and extensive biodiversity” and it forms a “buffer between the built environment and the coastline”, he said.
Meanwhile, another site in Roscam was also rezoned from G agriculture to R2 Residential against the advice of planners.
Some 14 councillors voted to rezone the land and insert a specific objective that it is for one house reserved for the immediate family of the landowner.
Senior Planner Helen Coleman said there was no requirement for additional residential lands.
Ms Phelan said the rezoning would not be democratic, sets a precedent and would undermine sustainability.
Mr McGrath urged them to retain the existing zoning otherwise it could “erode the character of the area” and conflict with planning policy.
(Main map shows the 1.67-hectare site close to the coastline in Roscam, smaller map is of the 0.877ha land)