Classifieds Advertise Archive Subscriptions Family Announcements Photos Digital Editions/Apps
Connect with us

CITY TRIBUNE

Political donors disappear – what price democracy?

Dara Bradley

Published

on

Not one Galway City Councillor received a single political donation exceeding €600 to fight last May’s Local Election

Bradley Bytes – A Sort of Political Column with Dara Bradley 

Where have all the political donors gone? When filling out Statements of Expenditure for elections, candidates must declare whether they have received political donations of more than €600. But not one councillor or unsuccessful candidate in May’s local election to Galway City Council, declared that they received €600 or more from a political donor.

Maybe the term ‘political donation’ has been sullied by the brown envelope culture of the past but the tradition of funding candidates’ campaigns – so long as there’s no political favours in return, such as re-zonings – ought not necessarily be a negative thing.

People who donate to charity are lauded, and yet a similar act of civic responsibility by people supporting a candidate because they agree with their political view of the world, is now frowned upon.

It means that candidates must find alternatives. Fine Gael candidates got money back from party HQ – Clodagh Higgins, Eddie Hoare and Frank Fahy were reimbursed €840, €840 and €970 respectively. Unsuccessful candidates John Walsh, Pearce Flannery and Donal Lynch also got some money back from FG.

Fianna Fáil funded one ad worth €500 each to Ollie and Mike Crowe and John Connolly. The Green Party paid €2,206 of Pauline O’Reilly’s campaign and more than €900 for Martina O’Connor’s campaign.

Not everyone was so lucky. Spare a thought for Pat Hardiman, a late entrant into the race in City East. Pat, who stuck by his principles, left Labour to run as an Independent but didn’t feature in the ‘business end’ when votes were counted. A taxi man, Pat’s returns note that he took out a €1,000 credit union loan to fund his campaign, in addition to €1,355 of his own resources.

Cllr Mike Cubbard (Ind) said he raised €2,000 from a table quiz – that meant he had to spend just €161 of his own resources on the campaign. Cllr Colette Connolly (Ind) spent just €1,441 in total, and applied for €250 electoral support from ‘Independent Women in Politics’ to offset some of the cost.

Aontú’s Nuala Nolan, unsuccessful in City East, spent €1,700 – but not a cent of it was her own money, and all was raised through GoFundMe, fundraisers or from party HQ. Her party colleague, Cormac Ó Corcoráin, unsuccessful in City Central, also raised nearly €2,000 through GoFundMe and party HQ.

Labour’s John McDonagh, who lost out in City Central, was perhaps the most successful fundraiser – he said he got €2,760 in cash from a barbeque.

Darius Ivan (Ind) in City West, didn’t raise a cent but wasn’t out of pocket – he was the only candidate who filed returns who spent absolutely nothing on the campaign. He got just 30 first preference votes. Others who didn’t break the bank – and whose votes reflected that – were: Independents James O’Toole (spent €75, won 124 votes); Tommy Roddy (spent €116, won 137 votes), Marc Anderson (spent €184, won 91 votes) and Claire Keegan (spent €625 and won 30 votes – €20 per vote).

 

*For more Bradley Bytes see this week’s Galway City Tribune

CITY TRIBUNE

Galway City Council turns down Mad Yolk Farm site

Dara Bradley

Published

on

An application to retain farming-related development on a site in Roscam has been turned down by Galway City Council.

The local authority has refused to grant retention permission to applicant Brian Dilleen for subsurface piping to be used for agricultural irrigation at ‘Mad Yolk Farm’ on Rosshill Road.

It also refused permission for the retention of a bore-hole well, water pump and concrete plinth; and two water holding tanks for 6,500 litres; and other associated site works.

In its written decision, the Planning Department at City Hall said: “The proposed development, would if permitted, facilitate the use of the site for the provision of sixty 15.5m high seed beds, which have been deemed by the planning authority not to be exempted development.

“Therefore a grant of permission for the proposed development would facilitate the unauthorised development and usage on the site, contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.”

The site has been the subject of enforcement action by the local authority.

A lengthy Appropriate Assessment Screening report, submitted with the planning application, concluded “beyond reasonable scientific doubt, in view of the best scientific knowledge, on the basis of objective information and in light of the conservation objectives of the relevant European sites, that the proposed retention and development, individually or in combination with other plans and projects, has not and will not have a significant effect on any European site”.

A borehole Impact Assessment Report concluded that the proposed retention development “on the hydraulic properties of the aquifer is considered negligible”.

It said that there was “no potential for significant effects on water quality, groundwater dependent habitats or species associated with any European site”.

Six objections were lodged by neighbours, including one from the Roshill/Roscam Residents Association, which argued the Further Information submitted by the applicant did “little to allay our concerns” about the impact of the development on an “extremely sensitive site”.

The applicant has until June 29 to appeal the decision to An Bórd Pleanála.

Continue Reading

CITY TRIBUNE

NUIG student accommodation firm records loss

Enda Cunningham

Published

on

The property company which operates student accommodation on behalf of NUI Galway recorded a €3.4 million increase in turnover in 2019.

However, Atalia Student Residences DAC (Designated Activity Company), which is owned by the university, recorded a loss for the year of €6,300.

Accounts for the company for the year ended August 31, 2019, show that while there was a loss, retained profits are at more than €1.6 million. The accounts are the most up to date available from the Companies Registration Office.

The previous year, the company made a profit of more than €460,000.

Atalia Student Residences operates the 764-bed Corrib Village apartment complex and the 429-bed Goldcrest Village.

The figures show that the company’s overall turnover jumped by 52% – from €6.4m to €9.8m.

Turnover for accommodation services was up from €5.2m to €8.4m; and from conferences and events was up from €850,000 to €1.1m. Turnover from shops was down from almost €328,000 to €290,000.

Outside of the academic year, both complexes are used as accommodation for conference delegates, while Corrib Village is also used for short-term holiday lets.

The accounts show fixed assets – including fixtures and fittings, plant and machinery and office equipment – valued at €1.5m. Its current assets were valued at more than €7m, including ‘cash at bank and in hand’ of almost €6.9m (up from €5.6m last year).

The company owed creditors €6.9m, including €5.2m in deferred income.

It employed 38 people (which includes its five directors) last year, up from 31 the previous year.

As well as operating the student accommodation complexes, the company also markets conference facilities and services on behalf of the university.

It pays rent to NUIG but the figure is not included in the company accounts. In 2018, the rent figure was just over €2.25m.

In Corrib Village, a single bedroom with a private en suite for the academic year costs €5,950. For Goldcrest Village, the figure is €6,760.

Continue Reading

CITY TRIBUNE

Call for two-way cycling under Galway City outdoor dining plan

Dara Bradley

Published

on

Bike users want the local authority to examine the introduction of two-way cycling on one-way city centre streets.

Galway Cycling Campaign has again called for cycling to be allowed both ways. It comes as Galway City Council prepares to cordon-off parts of city centre streets to traffic, and make Dominick Street Lower one-way, to facilitate outdoor dining.

The cycling organisation said that the proposed pedestrianisation plan at the Small Crane, and the one-way system on Dominick Street, will result in lengthy diversions for people on bikes.

It has pointed out that school children and their guardians who cycle along Raleigh Row, and turn right towards Sea Road, will probably continue to do so even when the Small Crane is cordoned off to traffic, because the alternative route – via Henry Street – is too long a detour.

Similarly, it has been suggested that food-delivery services on bikes are unlikely to go the ‘long way round’ via Mill Street and New Road to get from Bridge Mills to restaurants on Dominick Street and would be tempted to cycle the ‘wrong way’ down the proposed one-way street or on the footpath.

Shane Foran, committee member of Galway Cycling Campaign, said now would be an ideal time to introduce two-way cycling on some one-way streets.

“It’s not controversial,” insisted Mr Foran. “It’s a general principle in other countries, if you are putting in new traffic arrangements, you would try and keep access for people on bikes.”

The regulation is contained in the National Cycle Policy Framework 2009; and a specific objective was contained in two of the most recent previous City Development Plans.

He said a former minister and Galway West TD, the late Bobby Molloy, had the vision to change the legislation in the late 1990s – but it hasn’t yet been embraced here.

“Bobby Molloy, who couldn’t be classed as an eco warrior, changed the law in 1998, so that it is available to local authorities to put up a sign granting an exemption from restrictions for people cycling on one-way streets.

“The road stays one-way for cars, and two ways for bicycles. Clearly that’s not going to be a sensible to do everywhere, like Merchants’ Road. In those situations, you might need a cycle track or lane to segregate people from traffic.

“But if it’s a low traffic street, with low speeds or relatively lower volumes of cars, then it should be possible for people on bicycles to cycle in both directions and still have it one-way for cars, without it being a major safety issue. It works in other countries,” said Mr Foran.

Continue Reading

Local Ads

Local Ads

Advertisement
Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement

Trending