Classifieds Advertise Archive Subscriptions Family Announcements Photos Digital Editions/Apps
Connect with us


Plans lodged for apartment blocks on Salthill site

Enda Cunningham



Plans have been lodged by a major local property developer to demolish a bungalow in Salthill to make way for the construction of 39 apartments.

Catena Property Company Ltd – which is owned by Tom McEvaddy Junior, formerly of Nexus Homes – has sought permission to demolish ‘Cova da Iria’, 105 Upper Salthill, a small bungalow on a half-acre site opposite the former Warwick Hotel.

The plans are for two blocks of apartments – one fronting onto Upper Salthill (Block B) and the other onto Toft Park (Block A).

Block A will be 6-8 storeys in height and will have 26 two-bed apartments and a three-bed penthouse, along with a community room, roof garden and patio at penthouse level.

Block B will be 3-4 storeys high and will have 11 one-bed apartments and a three-bed penthouse, along with a winter garden/balcony at penthouse level, as well as a concierge room.

The plans include new vehicular access from Upper Salthill Road, basement parking for 31 cars and 30 racks for bicycles. The proposals include solar panels at roof level and a rainwater harvesting system.

According to the planning application, at pre-planning meetings, the proposed scheme was agreed in principle and “deemed to be an appropriate use” of the site.

“The proposal represents an opportunity to redevelop and under-utilised infill and brownfield site. The subject site is zoned ‘residential’ and is fully serviced and is capable of accommodating higher density residential development at this appealing seafront location along a public transport corridor,” the application reads.

It also notes that the design has been ‘future-proofed’ so that it could facilitate redevelopment of a site next door – not in the applicant’s ownership – “to enable the completion of the streetscape at this location”.

According to the application, the fact that the site is located on the proposed high-frequency bus route under the Galway Transport Strategy, a reduced carparking requirement can be considered by the Council.

“Owing to the nature of the proposed higher-density apartment development, situated along a public transport corridor where a bus stop is located, a reduced carparking provision can be considered in this case.

“We consider that a relaxation of the carparking requirement can also be considered owing to the lower anticipated carparking demand from the 11 one-bed apartments, together with the spare carparking capacity experienced at the public carpark at Toft Park,” the application reads.

Toft Carpark and apartment blocks along Quincentennial Drive have flooded on several occasions in recent years.

“Although there is no history of flooding on site, the proposed development has been designed to ensure it is not vulnerable to flooding in the future,” the application reads.

According to plans, a Flood Risk Assessment for the area states that the risk of flooding is minimal and it is also predicted that the two proposed apartment blocks will not impact flood risk elsewhere in the area.

“Having regard to the height and character of development in the area, the infill and brownfield condition of the site, the seafront/parkland setting within the built environment of Salthill, the high quality nature of sustainable benefits of the proposed scheme, on serviced residential zoned lands along a public transport corridor, together with Government policy on apartments, housing and infill residential development, a grant of permission can be considered in this case,” the application reads.

The house was purchased in March of this year for €1.8 million, having gone to auction with a guide price of €1m.

A decision on the proposal is expected from City Hall at the beginning of January.


Galway City Council turns down Mad Yolk Farm site

Dara Bradley



An application to retain farming-related development on a site in Roscam has been turned down by Galway City Council.

The local authority has refused to grant retention permission to applicant Brian Dilleen for subsurface piping to be used for agricultural irrigation at ‘Mad Yolk Farm’ on Rosshill Road.

It also refused permission for the retention of a bore-hole well, water pump and concrete plinth; and two water holding tanks for 6,500 litres; and other associated site works.

In its written decision, the Planning Department at City Hall said: “The proposed development, would if permitted, facilitate the use of the site for the provision of sixty 15.5m high seed beds, which have been deemed by the planning authority not to be exempted development.

“Therefore a grant of permission for the proposed development would facilitate the unauthorised development and usage on the site, contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.”

The site has been the subject of enforcement action by the local authority.

A lengthy Appropriate Assessment Screening report, submitted with the planning application, concluded “beyond reasonable scientific doubt, in view of the best scientific knowledge, on the basis of objective information and in light of the conservation objectives of the relevant European sites, that the proposed retention and development, individually or in combination with other plans and projects, has not and will not have a significant effect on any European site”.

A borehole Impact Assessment Report concluded that the proposed retention development “on the hydraulic properties of the aquifer is considered negligible”.

It said that there was “no potential for significant effects on water quality, groundwater dependent habitats or species associated with any European site”.

Six objections were lodged by neighbours, including one from the Roshill/Roscam Residents Association, which argued the Further Information submitted by the applicant did “little to allay our concerns” about the impact of the development on an “extremely sensitive site”.

The applicant has until June 29 to appeal the decision to An Bórd Pleanála.

Continue Reading


NUIG student accommodation firm records loss

Enda Cunningham



The property company which operates student accommodation on behalf of NUI Galway recorded a €3.4 million increase in turnover in 2019.

However, Atalia Student Residences DAC (Designated Activity Company), which is owned by the university, recorded a loss for the year of €6,300.

Accounts for the company for the year ended August 31, 2019, show that while there was a loss, retained profits are at more than €1.6 million. The accounts are the most up to date available from the Companies Registration Office.

The previous year, the company made a profit of more than €460,000.

Atalia Student Residences operates the 764-bed Corrib Village apartment complex and the 429-bed Goldcrest Village.

The figures show that the company’s overall turnover jumped by 52% – from €6.4m to €9.8m.

Turnover for accommodation services was up from €5.2m to €8.4m; and from conferences and events was up from €850,000 to €1.1m. Turnover from shops was down from almost €328,000 to €290,000.

Outside of the academic year, both complexes are used as accommodation for conference delegates, while Corrib Village is also used for short-term holiday lets.

The accounts show fixed assets – including fixtures and fittings, plant and machinery and office equipment – valued at €1.5m. Its current assets were valued at more than €7m, including ‘cash at bank and in hand’ of almost €6.9m (up from €5.6m last year).

The company owed creditors €6.9m, including €5.2m in deferred income.

It employed 38 people (which includes its five directors) last year, up from 31 the previous year.

As well as operating the student accommodation complexes, the company also markets conference facilities and services on behalf of the university.

It pays rent to NUIG but the figure is not included in the company accounts. In 2018, the rent figure was just over €2.25m.

In Corrib Village, a single bedroom with a private en suite for the academic year costs €5,950. For Goldcrest Village, the figure is €6,760.

Continue Reading


Call for two-way cycling under Galway City outdoor dining plan

Dara Bradley



Bike users want the local authority to examine the introduction of two-way cycling on one-way city centre streets.

Galway Cycling Campaign has again called for cycling to be allowed both ways. It comes as Galway City Council prepares to cordon-off parts of city centre streets to traffic, and make Dominick Street Lower one-way, to facilitate outdoor dining.

The cycling organisation said that the proposed pedestrianisation plan at the Small Crane, and the one-way system on Dominick Street, will result in lengthy diversions for people on bikes.

It has pointed out that school children and their guardians who cycle along Raleigh Row, and turn right towards Sea Road, will probably continue to do so even when the Small Crane is cordoned off to traffic, because the alternative route – via Henry Street – is too long a detour.

Similarly, it has been suggested that food-delivery services on bikes are unlikely to go the ‘long way round’ via Mill Street and New Road to get from Bridge Mills to restaurants on Dominick Street and would be tempted to cycle the ‘wrong way’ down the proposed one-way street or on the footpath.

Shane Foran, committee member of Galway Cycling Campaign, said now would be an ideal time to introduce two-way cycling on some one-way streets.

“It’s not controversial,” insisted Mr Foran. “It’s a general principle in other countries, if you are putting in new traffic arrangements, you would try and keep access for people on bikes.”

The regulation is contained in the National Cycle Policy Framework 2009; and a specific objective was contained in two of the most recent previous City Development Plans.

He said a former minister and Galway West TD, the late Bobby Molloy, had the vision to change the legislation in the late 1990s – but it hasn’t yet been embraced here.

“Bobby Molloy, who couldn’t be classed as an eco warrior, changed the law in 1998, so that it is available to local authorities to put up a sign granting an exemption from restrictions for people cycling on one-way streets.

“The road stays one-way for cars, and two ways for bicycles. Clearly that’s not going to be a sensible to do everywhere, like Merchants’ Road. In those situations, you might need a cycle track or lane to segregate people from traffic.

“But if it’s a low traffic street, with low speeds or relatively lower volumes of cars, then it should be possible for people on bicycles to cycle in both directions and still have it one-way for cars, without it being a major safety issue. It works in other countries,” said Mr Foran.

Continue Reading

Local Ads

Local Ads