City Council planners have expressed concerns over a proposal to create a beer garden behind a pub on Dominick Street, claiming it will be twice the size of the existing bar.
The Chief Fire Officer has also said the proposals would not meet fire regulations, as the means of escape would be onto the Mill Race.
Renmore Inn Ltd – which operates Carroll’s bar at 39 Dominick Street – has applied to the City Council for permission to use part of the space at the rear of numbers 41 and 43 as a beer garden.
According to the applicant, Darragh Mullin, the purpose of the beer garden is to provide space for patrons to gather. “This will eliminate the need to patrons to go outside onto the public footpath to smoke, etc.
The provision of an internal space within the confines of the adjoining buildings to accommodate smoking patrons of the public house will reduce the existing impact on the amenities of adjacent residential properties.
“The current practice of patrons smoking on the street outside cannot be controlled by the publican. There will be no live music in this area either, so as to protect the enjoyment of the adjacent and nearby properties,” the application reads.
It is proposed for the beer garden to be open from 11.30am to 11.30pm on Monday to Thursdays, 11.30am to 12.30am on Fridays, 11am to 12.30am on Saturdays and 11am to 11pm on Sundays, and no food will be served in the area.
However, the City Council has sought further information on the plans, particularly the scale of the beer garden.
“The submitted drawings do not make clear whether the outdoor seating for up to 60 patrons is covered or partially covered and the applicant is requested to clarify this and provide details of any outside heaters, bar or restaurant facilities which could enable the more intensive use of the outdoor area.
“The proposed beer garden is more than twice the area of the existing public house and this scale of usage could raise concerns in terms of noise and outdoor activity in what should be a subsidiary element,” planners said.
They also requested details of noise management to prevent nuisance for surrounding residents.
Galway’s Golden Girls mark big birthdays!
Two of Galway’s Golden Girls celebrates milestone birthdays on either side of the county this week – racking up a magnificent 210 years between them.
Oughterard’s Phyl Furness celebrated her 107th birthday this week – and Mary O’Leary marked her mere 103rd birthday in Ardrahan!
Phyl, who is originally from Nottinghamshire in England, moved to Ireland in the 1980s – and has been a wonderful part of her Oughterard community ever since.
Mary was born Mary Quinn on May 23 1919 in Ballinlisheen, Tubber, Co. Clare, to John Quinn and Mary Kate McKague. She never saw her father as he passed away before she was born, leaving her an only child.
She attended Boston National School and Gort Secondary School, and from a young age worked on the family farm.
Mary married her husband Joe O’ Leary in Tubber church in 1948. They lived in Ballinlisheen until Joe passed away in July 1997 – and Mary then moved to Gort town.
She moved to the Little Flower Nursing Home, Labane, Ardrahan, on October 14 2011 where she has enjoyed a very fulfilled few years since.
Mary is an avid reader; she loves thrillers and romance, according to Joan Gardiner Surman, Proprietor of the Little Flower Nursing Home.
“She keeps herself informed by reading the daily paper and loves Hello magazine, she has a huge interest in the Royal family,” she said.
She celebrated her birthday in the Little Flower Nursing Home a day early on Sunday – surrounded by her family, the staff who take such great care of her and all the residents of the Little Flower.
“She received a lovely letter of congratulations from President Michael D. Higgins along with a beautiful commemorative medal,” added Joan.
Photos: Mary O’Leary celebrating her 103rd birthday and (right) Oughterard’s Phyl Furness, who celebrated a magnificent 107th birthday this week.
Ombudsman hears of 125 allegations against Galway Gardaí
A total of 125 allegations were made against Gardaí in Galway last year, according to a report by Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission (GSOC).
There were 105 allegations made against Galway Gardaí in 2020, and so the figure of 125 last year represents a yearly increase of 19%.
It is also higher than the figure of 103 allegations in GSOC’s 2019 report.
The increase in complaints made to GSOC about Gardaí in Galway mirrors a national trend. In 2021, according to GSOC, 12% more complaints and allegations were lodged against Gardaí.
Among the most common complaints were neglect of duty, which ranges in seriousness from not returning a phone call or not properly investigating a crime; abuse of authority, which could include excessive force; non-fatal offences, which could include assault; and discourtesy, which relates to the manner in which a Garda spoke or behaved towards a person.
Meanwhile, complaints to the recently appointed Public Service Ombudsman Ger Deering reached a new high of 4,004 last year – a 17% increase on 2020, and the highest ever in the 38-year history of the Ombudsman.
And 208 of these complaints came from people in Galway; 53 were made about Galway County Council and the Ombudsman received 42 about Galway City Council. NUIG was the subject of six complaints.
Two complaints were received about Galway Mayo Institute of Technology while the Galway and Roscommon Education and Training Board was the subject of one complaint.
This is a shortened preview version of this article. To read the rest of the story, see the May 27 edition of the Connacht Tribune. You can buy a digital edition HERE.
Flexibility needed on designation of Connemara bogs
A Galway senator has called for flexibility to make ‘small local changes’ over the coming years in relation to the SAC designation of the massive Connemara Bog complex.
Senator Seán Kyne told the Connacht Tribune that such flexibility could make a big difference to local families and communities within this SAC (Special Area of Conservation).
“There are a lot of local issues that arise. For example, people from the area can find it difficult to get planning on their own land and allowance could be made for small community projects that mightn’t necessarily tie in with the SAC requirements,” said Seán Kyne.
He said that in cases like those, where a small area could be taken out of the SAC, it should be possible to compensate with the inclusion of another similar sized portion of land on the fringes of the designation.
Senator Kyne – who raised the matter with Minister of State (Local Government) Peter Burke in a recent Seanad debate – said that the size of the Connemara Bog complex site was very large, approximately 50,000 hectares (c. 125,000 acres).
He added that there was a long-running history to the SAC application dating back to 1997 with a lot of appeals to parts of the designation for an area bounded to the north by Galway-Clifden Road (N59) and to the south by the Moycullen-Spiddal road (L1320).
“The Department is engaging in the final signing off of the SAC. I am inquiring in regard to clarification on the appeals. Will there be any future opportunities in regard to appeals?
“I am not talking about large-scale changes. In some cases, there may be a request for some minor changes to the boundaries of the SAC in the future.
“It could be to rectify some issues where there may be mistakes on the mapping, for example, or there could be areas which are commercially sensitive to somebody, and it may make sense to make a slight change in the boundary and that could be compensated elsewhere with the inclusion of another area . . .
“Can there be minor, but perhaps important, changes in the future which would benefit society, the economy and local communities, whether it is a requirement to remove a small piece to allow for a piece of amenity or commercial infrastructure? Clarification on the processes into the future is important,” said Senator Kyne in the Seanad debate.
Minister of State, Peter Burke, said in reply that the criteria used to set the boundaries of the SAC sites were purely scientific as was required in the nature directives.
He said that since the first public notification of the designation back in 1997, there were 60 appeals or objections received – nine of those were successful; 12 were partially successful; 21 were unsuccessful; and 18 were deemed invalid.
“The appeals process for this site has now concluded and the site has moved onto the final stage of the process which requires the publication of a statutory instrument, formally designating the site.
“The statutory instrument includes a description of the site, a detailed map showing the area, a complete list of habitats and species for which the area was selected and a list of activities which require the consent of the Minister before they can be undertaken in a way that affects the site.
“It is important to note that all relevant protections under Irish law apply to the site from the time  it was publicly notified as proposed for designation,” said Minister of State, Peter Burke.