County roads within a 25km radius of the city are going to get preferential treatment when it comes to the allocation of funding for upgrade and pothole repairs.
Galway county councillors have voted in favour of allocating 10% of any additional roads funding from central Government to roads within 25 kilometres of Galway City.
The existing allocation will be applied on a per-kilometre basis, with any extra monies to be weighted mostly in favour of roads within the Athenry/Oranmore municipal district.
Despite fears that this could lead to a deterioration of roads in the most rural parts of County Galway, the motion put forward by Martina Kinnane (FF) was carried by 18 votes to 15, with one abstention.
The vote will be of most benefit to roads in the Athenry/ Oranmore municipal district, although it will also benefit some roads close to the city that are located in the Connemara and Tuam municipal areas.
Cllr Kinnane put forward the motion, arguing that Athenry/ Oranmore is disadvantaged by the current system in place for allocating roads funding.
Currently road maintenance is allocated on a per kilometre basis with Athenry/Oranmore getting just 9% of the funding compared with the four other municipal districts: Ballinasloe (20%), Connemara (20%), Loughrea (25%) and Tuam (26%).
Cllr Kinnane said “Ballinasloe will be the only area to see a reduction” under her proposal.
She said that in terms of the Local Property Tax, and commercial rates, Athenry/Oranmore was the “cash cow” for the County, and her resolution was about fairness.
Portumna-based Jimmy McClearn (FG) said he couldn’t support a tiered system of allocation of funding. “The people you represent aren’t any more important that the ones I represent,” he said.
He was voted in to try and do the best for every citizen of Galway and he “resented” the notion that one area would get preferential treatment.
Tuam’s Tom McHugh said it was “fair play” to disperse additional funds on a per kilometre basis.
Tomas Ó Curraoin, who is in Barna, said he lives within the 25 kilometre radius, and some of his constituents would benefit from it but he voted against because he couldn’t be treating constituents of his who live further back in Connemara differently.
James Charity (Ind) supported the measure and said that the roads within a 25-kilometre radius of the city were “overloaded with traffic”.
They were the roads that were used the most, by people travelling to the city, including by people from all five municipal districts, and not just the people living in Athenry/Oranmore municipal district.
Des Joyce (Ind) said there was “no way” he could support the move towards a two-tier system.
When the vote was passed, Cllr Kinnane paid tribute to the late Liam Gavin, an engineer who helped her to formulate the motion, and thanked Director of Services for Roads, Michael Timmins.
Galway’s Golden Girls mark big birthdays!
Two of Galway’s Golden Girls celebrates milestone birthdays on either side of the county this week – racking up a magnificent 210 years between them.
Oughterard’s Phyl Furness celebrated her 107th birthday this week – and Mary O’Leary marked her mere 103rd birthday in Ardrahan!
Phyl, who is originally from Nottinghamshire in England, moved to Ireland in the 1980s – and has been a wonderful part of her Oughterard community ever since.
Mary was born Mary Quinn on May 23 1919 in Ballinlisheen, Tubber, Co. Clare, to John Quinn and Mary Kate McKague. She never saw her father as he passed away before she was born, leaving her an only child.
She attended Boston National School and Gort Secondary School, and from a young age worked on the family farm.
Mary married her husband Joe O’ Leary in Tubber church in 1948. They lived in Ballinlisheen until Joe passed away in July 1997 – and Mary then moved to Gort town.
She moved to the Little Flower Nursing Home, Labane, Ardrahan, on October 14 2011 where she has enjoyed a very fulfilled few years since.
Mary is an avid reader; she loves thrillers and romance, according to Joan Gardiner Surman, Proprietor of the Little Flower Nursing Home.
“She keeps herself informed by reading the daily paper and loves Hello magazine, she has a huge interest in the Royal family,” she said.
She celebrated her birthday in the Little Flower Nursing Home a day early on Sunday – surrounded by her family, the staff who take such great care of her and all the residents of the Little Flower.
“She received a lovely letter of congratulations from President Michael D. Higgins along with a beautiful commemorative medal,” added Joan.
Photos: Mary O’Leary celebrating her 103rd birthday and (right) Oughterard’s Phyl Furness, who celebrated a magnificent 107th birthday this week.
Ombudsman hears of 125 allegations against Galway Gardaí
A total of 125 allegations were made against Gardaí in Galway last year, according to a report by Garda Síochána Ombudsman Commission (GSOC).
There were 105 allegations made against Galway Gardaí in 2020, and so the figure of 125 last year represents a yearly increase of 19%.
It is also higher than the figure of 103 allegations in GSOC’s 2019 report.
The increase in complaints made to GSOC about Gardaí in Galway mirrors a national trend. In 2021, according to GSOC, 12% more complaints and allegations were lodged against Gardaí.
Among the most common complaints were neglect of duty, which ranges in seriousness from not returning a phone call or not properly investigating a crime; abuse of authority, which could include excessive force; non-fatal offences, which could include assault; and discourtesy, which relates to the manner in which a Garda spoke or behaved towards a person.
Meanwhile, complaints to the recently appointed Public Service Ombudsman Ger Deering reached a new high of 4,004 last year – a 17% increase on 2020, and the highest ever in the 38-year history of the Ombudsman.
And 208 of these complaints came from people in Galway; 53 were made about Galway County Council and the Ombudsman received 42 about Galway City Council. NUIG was the subject of six complaints.
Two complaints were received about Galway Mayo Institute of Technology while the Galway and Roscommon Education and Training Board was the subject of one complaint.
This is a shortened preview version of this article. To read the rest of the story, see the May 27 edition of the Connacht Tribune. You can buy a digital edition HERE.
Flexibility needed on designation of Connemara bogs
A Galway senator has called for flexibility to make ‘small local changes’ over the coming years in relation to the SAC designation of the massive Connemara Bog complex.
Senator Seán Kyne told the Connacht Tribune that such flexibility could make a big difference to local families and communities within this SAC (Special Area of Conservation).
“There are a lot of local issues that arise. For example, people from the area can find it difficult to get planning on their own land and allowance could be made for small community projects that mightn’t necessarily tie in with the SAC requirements,” said Seán Kyne.
He said that in cases like those, where a small area could be taken out of the SAC, it should be possible to compensate with the inclusion of another similar sized portion of land on the fringes of the designation.
Senator Kyne – who raised the matter with Minister of State (Local Government) Peter Burke in a recent Seanad debate – said that the size of the Connemara Bog complex site was very large, approximately 50,000 hectares (c. 125,000 acres).
He added that there was a long-running history to the SAC application dating back to 1997 with a lot of appeals to parts of the designation for an area bounded to the north by Galway-Clifden Road (N59) and to the south by the Moycullen-Spiddal road (L1320).
“The Department is engaging in the final signing off of the SAC. I am inquiring in regard to clarification on the appeals. Will there be any future opportunities in regard to appeals?
“I am not talking about large-scale changes. In some cases, there may be a request for some minor changes to the boundaries of the SAC in the future.
“It could be to rectify some issues where there may be mistakes on the mapping, for example, or there could be areas which are commercially sensitive to somebody, and it may make sense to make a slight change in the boundary and that could be compensated elsewhere with the inclusion of another area . . .
“Can there be minor, but perhaps important, changes in the future which would benefit society, the economy and local communities, whether it is a requirement to remove a small piece to allow for a piece of amenity or commercial infrastructure? Clarification on the processes into the future is important,” said Senator Kyne in the Seanad debate.
Minister of State, Peter Burke, said in reply that the criteria used to set the boundaries of the SAC sites were purely scientific as was required in the nature directives.
He said that since the first public notification of the designation back in 1997, there were 60 appeals or objections received – nine of those were successful; 12 were partially successful; 21 were unsuccessful; and 18 were deemed invalid.
“The appeals process for this site has now concluded and the site has moved onto the final stage of the process which requires the publication of a statutory instrument, formally designating the site.
“The statutory instrument includes a description of the site, a detailed map showing the area, a complete list of habitats and species for which the area was selected and a list of activities which require the consent of the Minister before they can be undertaken in a way that affects the site.
“It is important to note that all relevant protections under Irish law apply to the site from the time  it was publicly notified as proposed for designation,” said Minister of State, Peter Burke.